A NOTHING-BURGER WITH A SIDE OF LIES
Guest post by Roger Stone
Ever since I refused to buckle from the pressure from Special Counsel Robert Mueller to testify falsely against President Donald Trump in return for vague promises of “leniency” in my sentencing after being convicted in a Soviet-style show trial for the entirely fabricated crime of “lying to Congress” about nonexistent Russian collusion, the Democrat/fake news media cabal has been out to get me.
Although I was first banned for life on Twitter in 2017, on the same day that the D.C. Court of Appeals upheld my conviction despite the epic corruption of the jury forewoman in my case, Facebook and Instagram announced that I would be banned for life on those platforms as well. A similar ban on YouTube would follow. I didn’t even last two weeks on TikTok because I had the gall to point out that although I had been convicted of “lying to Congress,” Dr. Anthony Fauci had lied under oath to the Senate about U.S. taxpayer funding of the development of the Covid-19 vaccination in a Wuhan, China lab.
Although the U.S. Department of Justice was forced by a Federal Court order to release the long-hidden redacted sections of Robert Mueller’s final Report regarding me in which even he could not sugarcoat the fact that there was “no factual basis” to prosecute me for Russian collusion, WikiLeaks collaborations, or any involvement in the phishing or publication of John Podesta’s e-mails; the fake news media consistently omits this information while constantly referring to me as a “convicted felon.” Strangely, the Department of Justice’s press release on this matter was put out at midnight on November 3rd, 2020 which was both election day and the busiest media day of the year…
The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, MSNBC, and all the other fake media news outlets who had taken advantage of the unconstitutional gag placed on me by the judge in my case and who had depicted me as both a “traitor” and a “Russian spy,” neglected to report what even BuzzFeed admitted was a “vindication.” The Gateway Pundit was among the few media outlets to report this startling development.
Roughly two weeks ago, Congressman Jamie Raskin, a member of the January 6th Committee, started tipping off reporters that the committee’s final hearing would include shocking new evidence that placed me in the center of a conspiracy regarding the illegal acts at the Capitol on January 6th—odd since I was not at The Ellipse, did not march to the Capitol, and was not at the Capitol on that day.
January 6th Committee staffers tipped other reporters that their final hearing would also reveal my central involvement in the efforts to “overturn” the electoral college certification of the election of Joe Biden, as well as my activities in a “War Room” at the Willard Hotel, which I was never in nor was I aware even aware of. Although I expressed my concerns about the anomalies and irregularities in the 2020 election results and the obvious fraud, I played no formal or informal role in the effort to delay the Electoral College certification.
Sara Murray of CNN – who had illegal possession of my sealed indictment at 6:00 A.M. on the day that 29-heavily armed FBI agents swarmed my home to arrest me for the benefit of CNN cameras – actually contacted my attorney, Grant Smith, to tell him that the committee would present evidence “enmeshing” me in the January 6th events. She was wrong.
That same day, we received the good news that my wife’s cancer PET scan showed that she has now been free of the aggressive stage 4 cancer she was diagnosed with after my pardon, for 18 months. This proves the healing power of Jesus Christ.
A week prior, CNN and MSNBC both aired leaked videos from the Committee which they claimed showed that it was always President Donald Trump’s plan to dispute the 2020 election even if he “lost.” In fact, the video they aired clearly shows me saying that Trump should declare victory only if the race was “up in the air“—precisely the same solid political and public relations advice former Secretary of State and the Treasury James A. Baker III gave to George W. Bush in 2000.
More curious, however, was a video supplied by disgruntled Danish documentary filmmakers who were following me that day in which the camera bounces around wildly but in which an audio track simultaneously plays what sounds like my voice calling for violence after the election.
At the January 6th Committee hearing, however, this same audio track was matched with a video of me walking through an airport wearing a “Trump 2020” Covid mask, and therefore, I am never actually seen saying the words attributed to me. In other words, the video shown by the January 6th Committee is a fraud. These are, after all, the same people who deleted Donald Trump’s call for his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol in the video of the President that they showed at a previous hearing.
I guess none of this is surprising in view of the fact that in their previous hearing, Cassidy Hutchinson (an aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows) said that it was her “understanding” that President Donald Trump had instructed Meadows to call both me and General Michael Flynn on the afternoon of January 5th in order to “find out what was going to happen on January 6th”, and that Meadows had subsequently received a telephone briefing on a meeting at the Willard that she alleged Flynn and I had attended. In other words, Hutchinson perjured herself because no such phone calls or meeting actually ever transpired.
Just as interesting as the videos that were shown by the January 6th Committee hearing on October 13th are the videos that weren’t shown.
Discredited Danish documentary filmmaker Christoffer Guldbrandsen told CNN that a speech that I gave at Freedom Plaza on January 5th “heavily incited violence.” Guldbrandsen’s comments are interesting in view of the fact that he wasn’t there and didn’t film my speech, which has subsequently been wiped from the internet. By watching my January 5th speech here you can see that there is not only no incitement of violence but my remarks are entirely consistent with both my apocalyptic view of the struggle that America faces and fall well within my free speech rights:
Even stranger is their failure to show a video of remarks I made at a legally permitted rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in which I clearly warn thousands of Trump supporters not to be baited into violence the following day:
Also strangely missing from the January 6th Committee presentation is the video outtake from my hotel room when immediately after President Trump’s remarks at The Ellipse concluded, a representative of the Secret Service called my room to offer me an armed escort to the Capitol which I thought unusual and declined.
The committee also failed to air documentary footage which proves my surprise regarding the events at the Capitol and in which I clearly state that those illegal actions were not only illegal but politically counterproductive to the President and the MAGA movement.
When it comes to “guilt by association,” Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren actually outdid her colleagues Jamie Raskin and Adam Schiff in her comments in the October 13th hearing. Lofgren’s claim that Joshua James, one of the Oath Keepers subsequently charged with seditious conspiracy, is a “close associate” of mine is undermined by the fact that I met James for the first time on January 5th. The claim of the opportunistic Danish documentary filmmakers that James was in my hotel room is a distortion of the fact that James evidently delivered my suitcase to the room but was in the suite for less than one minute.
Unfortunately, it is a sad fact that given the growing violence and public shaming by the American Left, I required security during my visit to Washington D.C. But because the off-duty D.C. Police Officers who had guarded me and my family during the pretrial motions and my actual trial in D.C. were unavailable, I had accepted a voluntary security detail from the Oath Keepers. This does not, however, mean that any member of the Oath Keepers divulged any plans for inappropriate and illegal activities to me prior to the events at the Capitol.
Similarly, Lofgren pointed out that I know Enrique Tarrio, the head of the Proud Boys, who comes from the same South Florida area where I live. Once again, the simple fact that I know Tarrio does not prove that I was aware of his alleged involvement in the illegal acts at the Capitol on January 6th.
This is the tactic of “guilt by association.” Congressman Adam Schiff has been photographed with notorious Los Angeles murderer Ed Buck, who infamously drugged and killed young Black men. By that token, does this mean Adam Schiff was in on the murders?
The entirely false narrative of the Democrat/fake news media cabal is that I sought a second pardon from President Donald Trump related to some “misdeed” on January 6th. In fact, as was widely reported earlier this year, I advocated a pardon for every Republican member of Congress and every high profile Trump supporter who publicly questioned the results of the 2020 election because I foresaw the efforts later revealed in a Homeland Security edict claiming that any American who questioned the election results could be prosecuted as a “domestic terrorist.” The letter I wrote the President is here:
Stone Pardon Letter by Jim Hoft on Scribd
The Danish propagandist filmmakers reached an agreement with me to produce a documentary about my two-year ordeal at the hands of Robert Mueller and his prosecutors—but when that struggle ended in a full presidential pardon, it evidently lost its commercial appeal. Christoffer Guldbrandsen said in an interview with CNN that I was “in the middle of a conspiracy to overturn the election”—but, as even Salon reported, the filmmakers told Don Lemon on-air that they “were not able to establish a connection between Stone, the Trump White House and the (extremist) groups.” I have now learned that the two years of documentary filming was paid for by the Danish Government through their intelligence agency. I have a clear case of defamation against them based solely on their own statements to CNN and MSNBC. The Danes have fled the country to avoid being served with my lawsuit.
As a parting shot, the duplicitous Danes released a “deep fake” video in which they allege that I attacked my friend of forty years, President Donald Trump. Any reasonable person looking at this video can clearly see that my mouth is obscured and that I can actually not be seen saying the words that they have attributed to me. In today’s day and age, audio and video can be manipulated to serve any purpose, and once the perpetrators have a digital recording of your voice in an innocent scenario, it can be made to sound and appear as if you have said anything.
This latest “deep fake” video defies logic. If I were going to flip against Donald Trump, why would I have not done so when threatened with a 7 to 9 year sentence and was under relentless pressure from Robert Mueller and his thugs? Why have I remained steadfast in my support for another Trump presidential bid in 2024? I could easily produce a deep fake video of Joe Biden saying that Donald Trump was the greatest President since Abraham Lincoln! That wouldn’t make it real.
Between fighting the 11 remaining baseless and meritless harassment civil lawsuits filed against my wife and I, legal representation in connection with the January 6th Committee investigation, and my wife’s continued uninsured medical expenses, the financial pressure posed against me by the Democrat fake news media cabal is relentless. Those patriots who want to help in this struggle can do this by going to: StoneFamilyFund.com
The post EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone on Jan 6 Accusations – “A Nothing-Burger with a Side of Lies” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.